I feel for Little Chandler. As a vertically challenged man
myself, I understand how height can have a significant effect on someone’s
psyche. This is especially true in a society like Dublin that emphasizes
manliness. For Chandler, the fact that he gives “one the idea of being a little
man” (55) means that people will never take him seriously as a man. Despite
only being “slightly under the average stature,” (55) due to his little-ness
others will always see him as somehow lacking.
As I started to read about Little Chandler, I could not help
but think about Oscar De Leon. Both
Chandler and Oscar fail to meet what their respective societies define as
masculinity. Chandler cannot be the masculine, woodsman type Irish man so he
opts for the Romantic Victorian instead and still fails. When he tries to
romantically read poetry to his wife, his “shyness had always held him back.”
(56) A man that is to shy to read poetry to his own wife, someone you should
have the utmost comfort with, is hardly a man at all. Similarly, Oscar cannot
seem to fit into his cultural norm or atomic level G. He spends his entire,
short life trying to fulfill the Dominican stereotype, failing at every point
along the way.
Both also have role models that perfectly fit their
culture’s idea of masculinity. For Chandler, Gallaher perfectly espouses the
Victorian man. With his “travelled air, his well-cut tweed suit, and fearless
accent,” (55) Gallaher seems like the perfect man. Typical of the educated
Dubliner, he even escapes the drudgery of Dublin to live in the “great city
London.” (55) Yunior, the consummate Dominican Man (without the violence), acts
as Oscar’s role model of sorts throughout the story. Yunior’s constant
womanizing and bravado give Oscar something to emulate, even though he
ultimately finds a better alternative. Both mentors also make them feel bad in
some way. While around Gallaher, even though Gallaher calls him Tommy, the
narrator always refers to him as Little Chandler, pointing towards Chandler’s
sense of inferiority to Gallaher. Similarly, Oscar always feels like less of a
Dominican when Yunior is around because of the comparison between the two. Interestingly,
both mentors lead their pupils down questionable paths. Gallaher pressures
Chandler into drinking, smoking, and even tries to convince him that Paris is
not an immoral city. In the same vein, Yunior constantly tries to get Oscar to
be more aggressive with women in an attempt to make him more of a womanizer.
What I cannot figure out, however, is what Joyce is trying
to say with Gallaher’s attempted corruption of Chandler. Is he trying to show
that even the most upright Dubliner will succumb to the pressures of the
outside world? That Dublin may not be that bad in terms of morality compared to
the international community? Or maybe even that there is something to be
desired in a little depravity?
I think that another detail that Joyce includes that also describes the relationship between Gallaher and Chandler is the use of names. The reader can notice how Chandler is not only called Little Chandler, but also Tommy, a diminutive. Tommy is what you'd call a little boy, and it is clear throughout the story that in some ways Chandler is still a boy compared to Gallaher - he looks up to him, is nervous around him, and wants to be as successful and as experienced as he is. Tommy radically contrasts with the name Ignatius, which sounds grand and sophisticated. Tommy is stuck as an inexperienced child, while Ignatius travels the world, "gets girls," and makes money.
ReplyDelete