The problem in Two Gallants is that these Dubliners don't want to leave.
Lenehan is called “a leech” in the very beginning of Two
Gallants (37). Why I think this description is appropriate unfortunately leaves
us with more questions than answers, but perhaps Joyce intended as much.
From the very first description of Lenehan, we can tell that
he must be somewhat of a suspicious figure: “in spite of his reputation, his
adroitness and eloquence had always prevented his friends from forming any
general policy against him” (37). What sort of adroitness allows a person to
force himself on his so-called “friends?” Lenehan’s confidence, his “brave
manner,” tends toward abrasive behavior as well. If you’ve ever had anyone
hover around your circle of friends until he barged his way in, you know what
Joyce is talking about. Lenehan oddly enough is equipped with “a vast stock of
stories, limericks and riddles” to assuage the awkwardness he causes. In fact,
even if someone were to call out Lenehan on his behavior, Lenehan would be “insensitive
to [this and] all kinds of discourtesy.” Joyce continues, “No one knew how he
achieved the stern task of living, but his name was vaguely associated with
racing tissues,” to point out that, although Lenehan is a weird fellow, nobody
thinks anything of him or his questionable activity…and that is precisely the
problem. Lenehan is representative of a larger group of young, disenfranchised
Dubliners. But everyone sees this group as indigenous to Dublin. As long as
people consider Lenehan a “sporting vagrant,” they will not be able to see the
disservice his ilk does Dublin generally.
Lenehan has lived in Dublin 31 years without making a valid
contribution societally. Even when he realizes this, he does not effect change,
but only worries more about the smalltime scam he is running with Corley.
Unfortunately, however, I can make no suggestion as to how Lenehan could change
his life at this point. What could he become to help Dublin? How does Dublin
even begin to alleviate this problem? Joyce doesn’t really answer, but just puts
it all on the table.
One thing about this story is that we're going from "Daybreak, gentlemen" to a story whose title implies the men are supposed to be gentlemanly (35). Momentarily we might have high hopes. But the men in this story also fail the definitional test. I do think it's meaningful that "After The Race" had a mix of men failing to meet the standard of decency. In that story, it's the two continentals and Jimmy, the Irishman. In this story it's a pair of Irishmen. Nobody seems to be good. Maybe the book is specifically intended as a call for Irish reform, but I think it also serves as a critique on everyone.
ReplyDelete